Should State Laws Be Able To Limit Free Speech Of Crisis Pregnancy Centers?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

In a rampant assault on personal liberties, Vermont's Democratic legislature has thrust a sword through the heart of free speech and choice! The National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) and two faith-based pregnancy centers have been forced to take up arms in a federal lawsuit, fighting back against this glaring overreach of power. The law, crafted under the disguise of regulation, allegedly censors these centers' rights to advertise their free services and imposes crippling financial penalties. The accused centers are also restricted from providing much-needed counsel and information to their clients, unless under the watch of a full medical staff. This blatant disregard for the sanctity of personal choice is a chilling glimpse into a future under such draconian measures!

How about we find out what YOU think?

In your opinion, how does Vermont's recent law restricting faith-based pregnancy centers impact free speech and choice?

This law upholds public safety and does not infringe on free speech or choice.
The law is an overreach, censoring non-profit organizations and limiting personal choice.
Neutral/No opinion on this matter.

The National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) and two faith-based pregnancy centers in Vermont filed a federal lawsuit against state officials for alleged restriction of free speech and their services, CBN reported Thursday.