TAKE THE POLL: CLICK HERE
Parts of this article were originally published by Million Voices. Click here to read in full.
The World Health Organization (WHO) adopted a global pandemic agreement on May 20, allowing the unelected group of representatives to create rules for the masses should another disease spread throughout our species.
Analysis From Experts
“Anyone who isn’t a fan of the coming global surveillance superstate is right to be concerned about the recent approval of the WHO Pandemic Agreement at the World Health Assembly meetings in Geneva. The point not to miss is that this sets in place a precedent for a global legal and policy architecture that will make it normative for more control to be consolidated in the hands of a few,” Family Research Council vice president of Policy and Government Affairs’ Travis Weber told the Washington Stand. (MORE NEWS: Drivers May Get Two Years To Renew Expired License Thanks To DMV Issues In One State)
“The next global crisis may not be from a virus; but it will likely be a ‘health emergency’ that will be used to once again justify infringements on individual human rights and freedoms. On top of that, accelerating progress on AI will allow such global control to be very intrusive and very effectively manipulated in the hands of a few.”
The WHO “agreement” also (according to another analysis from the Washington Stand):
- threatens national sovereignty;
- equates the health of humans with animals and plants;
- establishes a global super-government of unelected bureaucrats, who may alter the agreement at any time;
- transfers one-fifth of all U.S. vaccines and emergency equipment to WHO and regular monetary contributions to “developing countries” (a category that includes China);
- requires nations to follow WHO regulations on “routine immunization” and “social measures” including lockdowns, mask mandates, and social distancing;
- calls on nations to study factors that reduce public “trust” in government pandemic policies, such as mask and vaccine mandates or social distancing;
- would empower private-sector forces such as social media companies to ramp up censorship of disfavored viewpoints;
- aims to create equity-driven, universal national health care systems around the globe;
- does not define the terms “pandemic,” “gender,” or “women”; and
- has a “Hotel California” provision stating that a nation can never discharge any “obligations which accrued while it was a Party to the WHO Pandemic Agreement,” even after it withdraws.
To make matters worse, the Biden administration lobbied WHO to rename the Pandemic Treaty as an “Agreement” so it can adopt the measure without Senate ratification (which a treaty requires).
“We can, of course, continue to ignore the unelected authority of WHO members and pray that no future elected official of this nation bows to them during some hypothetical future pandemic. Many people ignored their rules during the COVID-19 pandemic, and they’re now falling on the right side of history,” the Modern Memo wrote in an analysis of the so-called agreement. “We’ve done it once, we can do it again, America.”
Read The Text In Full
How Do You Feel?
Did you know that lawmakers, business leaders, and even public servants use polling data to inform their policies and practices? These might seem like simple questions, but answering them can have far-reaching impacts on the world around you.
Don’t let your voice be lost in the ether of the Internet! Take control and take back your power today by signing up to take a poll — take all of them if you like!
The responses you give to our polls don’t just sit in the random void of nothingness that is most of the Internet. Your voice goes beyond these white pages and into the ears and eyes of real change makers — so THANK YOU for helping shape our future, today.